Re: {Collins} 30L-1 Input SWR High on 21/28 bands
- To: Bill Carns <wcarns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: {Collins} 30L-1 Input SWR High on 21/28 bands
- From: Mike Waters <mikewate@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 -0500
- Cc: "collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: collins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mfJibOV51RmBTcwPUfhAzmqVZYBufQkvAho1eAdAi7c=; b=D+DMEGeDGVuipBZ/8Dglb51nsYIWAINfBY+2TXR5ENaMOJFf0CndLMoB/fg3h7frV1 izWU+5fH0Rogjlh+ogCoPXGNd1HrgAVc4XdUQsTttTjussgYVxPazOW6ZuQ+0gIdf2a8 HeUA5VpQW0DU2dDt9FGQUWMAa+ATQpXfz5Jb0zc/PFGMU9WQLmJm98zhRGFVHhHNiloo dLk+XzTsvXSeRT8vZgH8KKrQ57cllw2PRTcDXHdMlTWcPOqOkhC7NNw+g/3jE4Iav+Mi oyq7nsqtOFlmytnbiCmNvH0RocSc/KovJZiKW+jXLkXsPYcKP9Nw+1vTUSxTxxxZDANP s/+Q==
- In-reply-to: <02ab01d09a55$e24c8e30$a6e5aa90$@austin.rr.com>
- References: <CAFDCxyTbEYp84a8HXaHRAaXk1bg6pVobXQwSpWGweAc-30fckA@mail.gmail.com> <000f01d09a00$61de9900$259bcb00$@com> <001301d09a04$d80f9170$882eb450$@com> <CA+FxYXgjs=OxgZ_0cRNjOEMnR+Zq1A1ZrQjHH=kgb35uQRZ36Q@mail.gmail.com> <026d01d09a14$ca2748e0$5e75daa0$@austin.rr.com> <039501d09a33$74c7dfd0$5e579f70$@cox.net> <CA+FxYXgudeDCM_Xrk9=w73VaJYLwXLQgciwV+EWxpVc5Xoa_CA@mail.gmail.com> <02ab01d09a55$e24c8e30$a6e5aa90$@austin.rr.com>
I don't have time to read all this now, but so far, so good, and I've
learned a few things. Thanks.
However, I did notice that you refer to RG-8; but Collins specified
RG-58C/U with more loss. Just food for thought. I didn't calculate anything.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Bill Carns <wcarns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Re the loss of the longer cable helping with stability. Hmmm.. The loss
> of a typical 9913 type (RG-8U) cable is less than one db total PER 100 FEET
> at 30 MHZ. The amount of loss injected into the stability picture at the
> input by using a 20.5 foot cable instead of the typical 4 to 6 feet of
> cable is mice nuts – much less than one db. I suspect strongly if loss was
> the motivation for the recommendation to use the longer cable, the length
> would not have been set at 20.5 feet.
>
>
>
> In fact, Warren Bruene wrote an article about the use of the 20.5 foot
> cable in the 30S-1. ... Gene Senti was the designer of that amp. This amp
> “inherited” the 30S-1 20.5 foot cable recommendation as far as we can tell.
> ... While there is a theoretical basis for using the 20.5 foot cable and
> Don did confirm the theory, he also concluded, as did Art, that it was
> unnecessary and lost in the “noise”.
>
[snip]
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.